Friday 27 May 2016

Short Inspirational Quotes & Motivational Quotes for Work

After the dry academic post, an equalizer in the form of a Quote Post… To my magnificent, motivation thirsty readers: A collection of the best short inspirational quotes and motivational quotes for work. about motivation, discipline & success. As well as great quotes about life, sprinkled with positivity, stoicism, time-management and other wise old sayings and proverbs, including a video.


 


short inspirational quotes for work


 


 


I am going to start the list by giving you an insight into my favourites. Let these ancient thinkers speak to you, internalise and philosophise about the meaning of every single one of them. They are the top quotes of all time and carefully handpicked for your enjoyment. Not only uplifting for not only rainy days but they will also bring you positivity and drive to complete your daily tasks.


If you feel like reading up on the creators of these quotes but are too lazy to google them? Fear not, teamwork is my pleasure and I have provided you with the Wikipedia links of most, but not all poets and magnificent minds.


 


The Content:


  1. Top Motivational Quotes for Work

  2. Top Short Inspirational Quotes

  3. Other great quotes related to the topic at hand. My favourite quotes about everything related to motivation, success, life, mindset, discipline, never quitting, quitting, etc.

 


Short Inspirational Quotes & Motivational Quotes for Work


Jordan-Belfort-Short-Inspirational-Quotes


Best Motivational Quotes for Work & Success


 


“The three great essentials to achieve anything worthwhile are, first, hard work; second, stick-to-itiveness; third, common sense.”


― Thomas A. Edison


 


“The dictionary is the only place that success comes before work. work is the key to success, and hard work can help you accomplish anything.”


― Vince Lombardi


 


“When you arise in the morning, think of what a precious privilege it is to be alive – to breathe, to think, to enjoy, to love.”


― Marc Aurel, on Monday Mornings


 


For me life is continuously being hungry. The meaning of life is not simply to exist, to survive, but to move ahead, to go up, to achieve, to conquer.


– Arnold Schwarzenegger


 


“The law of work seems unfair, but nothing can change it; the more enjoyment you get out of your work, the more money you will make.”


― Mark Twain


 


Always keep yourself busy and look for ways to gain an advantage:


In the absence of orders, go find something and kill it.


― Erwin Rommel





Fortes Fortuna Aduivat – Fortune Favours the Bold

– Roman Proverb


 


Big jobs usually go to the men who prove their ability to outgrow small ones.”


―Ralph Waldo Emerson


 


“Give yourself an even greater challenge than the one you are trying to master and you will develop the powers necessary to overcome the original difficulty.”


―William J. Bennett


 


“I’m really very self-confident when it comes to my work. When I take on a project, I believe in it 100%. I really put my soul into it. I’d die for it. That’s how I am.”

― Michael Jackson


 


A little Narcissism never hurt nobody:

“It is in fact the height of selfishness to merely consume what others create and to retreat into a shell of limited goals and immediate pleasures.”

― Robert Greene


 


“The only thing standing between you and your goal is the bullshit story you keep telling yourself as to why you can’t achieve it.”


― Jordan Belfort


 


“If it falls your lot to be a street sweeper, go out and sweep streets like Michelangelo painted pictures. Sweep streets like Handel and Beethoven composed music. Sweep streets like Shakespeare wrote poetry. Sweep streets so well that all the hosts of heaven and earth will have to pause and say, here lived a great street sweeper who swept his job well.”


Martin Luther King, Jr.


 


Are you under a deadline or time pressure in general? Mumble this sentence that was used to scare misconducting Roman children, back in the days:

 


“Hannibal ante portas”



Hannibal is at the gates


 


 


Best Short Inspirational Quotes


 


“You can look for external sources of motivation and that can catalyse a change, but it won’t sustain one. It has to be from an internal desire.”


― Jillian Michaels


in short:

“The foolish man seeks happiness in the distance. The wise grows it under his feet.”

― James Oppenheim


 


“You miss 100% of the shots you don’t take.”


―Wayne Gretzky


 


“Success consists of going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm”


― Winston Churchill


 


“Rise and rise again until lambs become lions”

― Robin Hood


 


“Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength.”


― Arnold Schwarzenegger


 


The mind is the limit. As long as the mind can envision the fact that you can do something, you can do it, as long as you really believe 100 percent.


― Arnold Schwarzenegger


 


“I will either find a way, or make one. (in Latin: Aut viam inveniam aut faciam)”


― Hannibal Barkas


 


“Pain is temporary. It may last a minute, or an hour, or a day, or a year, but eventually it will subside and something else will take its place. If I quit, however, it lasts forever.”


― Lance Armstrong


 


Acta non verba. Deeds, not words.


― Roman Proverb


 


Acta Non Verba Deeds not Words Latin Quote


 


Or how Walt Disney puts it: “The way to get started is to quit talking and begin doing. ”


and Jefferson: “Do you want to know who you are? Don’t ask. Act! Action will delineate and define you.”


Also, Lou Holtz gives us something to think about: “When all is said and done, more is said than done.”


And a bonus we are going to violate the short inspirational quotes with an amazing inspirational talk by Mr. Schwarzenegger during his commencement speech about the 6 rules of success: (Video below)


You never want to fail because you didn’t work hard enough. Mohammed Ali, one of my great heroes, had a great line in the ’70s when he was asked, “How many sit-ups do you do?” He said, “I don’t count my sit-ups. I only start counting when it starts hurting. When I feel pain, that’s when I start counting, because that’s when it really counts.” That’s what makes you a champion. No pain, no gain.



But when you’re out there partying, horsing around, someone out there at the same time is working hard. Someone is getting smarter and someone is winning. Just remember that. Now, if you want to coast through life, don’t pay attention to any of those rules. But if you want to win, there is absolutely no way around hard, hard work. Just remember, you can’t climb the ladder of success with your hands in your pockets.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5ZeIVPe5dg


 


This concludes my favourite short inspirational quotes and motivational quotes for work, but I can assure you that it was no easy choice. The following mixed quotes are all excellent as well, but making decisions is a necessary evil. Enjoy the rest.


 


Other great quotes about life, success, discipline, inspiration


 


“Desire is the key to motivation, but it’s the determination and commitment to unrelenting pursuit of your goal – a commitment to excellence – that will enable you to attain the success you seek.”

― Mario Andretti


 


“Excellence is an art won by training and habituation. We do not act rightly because we have virtue or excellence, but we rather have those because we have acted rightly. We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act but a habit.”


–Aristotle


 


“Hard work beats talent when talent fails to work hard.”

― Kevin Durant


 


“Creativity is more than just being different. Anybody can plan weird; that’s easy. What’s hard is to be as simple as Bach. Making the simple, awesomely simple, that’s creativity”


– Charles Mingus


 


 


Viral-Quotes-Intelligence-04-pink


 


 


“Discipline is the bridge between goals and accomplishment.”

― Jim Rohn


 


Training gives us an outlet for suppressed energies created by stress and thus tones the spirit just as exercise conditions the body.


– Arnold Schwarzenegger


 


“Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many.”


― Niccolò Machiavelli


 


“The secret of joy in work is contained in one word – excellence. To know how to do something well is to enjoy it.”


― Pearl S. Buck


 


Motivation is what gets you started. Habit is what keeps you going.

― Jim Rohn


 


The great fights with your strongest rivals are always the biggest motivation. When you win easily it’s not the same taste.

― Valentino Rossi


 


“If you hear a voice within you say, ‘You cannot paint,’ then by all means paint, and that voice will be silenced”


– Vincent Van Gogh


 


“A wise prince ought to observe some such rules, and never take things easy in peaceful times, but instead should vigorously use the time to his advantage in such a way that the resources may be available to him in times of adversity, so that he is prepared to resist fortune’s blows.” (Never slow down)


– Niccolò Machiavelli


 


“You were born to win, but to be a winner, you must plan to win, prepare to win, and expect to win.”


― Zig Ziglar


 


“It’s not the load that breaks you down, it’s the way you carry it.”

― Lou Holtz


 


“It’s hard to beat a person who never gives up.”

― Babe Ruth


 


“Ability is what you’re capable of doing. Motivation determines what you do. Attitude determines how well you do it.”

― Lou Holtz


 


Business Warfare Quotes


 


“It is not death that a man should fear, but he should fear never beginning to live.”





You have power over your mind – not outside events. Realize this, and you will find strength.




– Marcus Aurelius


 


What follows is an excellent short inspirational quote and reminder that the devil’s work is never completed. Just like Churchill said: “If you are going through hell, keep going.”


 


“People often say that motivation doesn’t last. Well, neither does bathing – that’s why we recommend it daily.”

― Zig Ziglar


 


This post is lacking creativity quotes hence here you are, Steve Jobs:




Creativity is just connecting things. When you ask creative people how they did something, they feel a little guilty because they didn’t really do it, they just saw something. It seemed obvious to them after a while. That’s because they were able to connect experiences they’ve had and synthesize new things.





 


“No one ever drowned in sweat.”


― U.S. Marine Corps


 


“It is better to act and repent, than not to act and regret.”


– Niccolò Machiavelli


 


Thank you for reading Short Inspirational Quotes & Motivational Quotes for Work and I hope that you have gathered a couple of quotes to reflect upon. Machiavels, I salute you. Stay tuned for the last part of the Craft of Power Summary and of course take another look at the 48 Laws of Power List if you haven’t already.

The Craft of Power Summary #2

The Craft of Power Review


 


This is Part 2 of 3 of The Craft of Power Summaries


Part #1 can be found here


Part #3 can be found here (in progress)


The book is rare and expensive though available on both the Internet and Amazon. You can find it here. Written by Ralph Gun Hoy Siu.


 


The Craft of Power Summary Part #2


 


HONING STRATEGIES AND TACTICS


 


The Eight Axioms

– Don’t confuse the platform for power with levers.

– Platforms are broad and strategic, levers are pointed and tactical.

– A platform is a springboard for many options, each lever is a commitment to a specific act.

– There are eight axioms that form quality strategy and tactics.

– 1: Adjust the objective to the resources, expending neither more for an intermediary target than it is worth in its contribution to the ultimate objective nor less than is needed to gain it.

– 2: Keep the objective always in sight, ensuring a clear line of attack without ending in a cul de sac.

– 3: Shape the operations so as to allow alternative tactical targets, thereby placing the opposition on the horns of dilemma.

– 4: Exploit the path of least resistance, always pointing in the direction of the final objective.

– 5: Pursue the course of least expectation on the part of the opposition, deceiving and beguiling to widen his miscalculation.

– 6: Maintain a flexible posture, responding to exigencies of the unexpected.

– 7: Refrain from repeating a line of attack that has just failed, recognising that the opposition had in all probability the reinforced themselves in the interim.

– 8: Dislocate the opposition, upsetting their strategic balance and disjoining their psychological reserve with goading lures and traps before striking the decisive blow.


 


Offense

– Though the general fundamentals remain the same, there are some small differences in how to obtain power depending on where you trying to obtain it. A king trying to take over a neighbouring kingdom may act a bit differently than an executive trying to overtake the CEO of a company. Calibration of tactics is key.

– When planning a takeover one must consider his options. If a direct takeover is not an option then one must resort to more indirect means.

– A direct takeover is simple. A king marches his army to the neighbouring country and invades. If a direct assault is not an option then resort to an indirect one.

– When resorting to an indirect takeover one must start small.

– Do not mount a new grab for power without a clear plan and knowing what will need to be done.

– Indirect takeover Phase 1: Get your allies appointed to key positions within the enemy structure. For example: a king wishing to take over a neighbouring kingdom indirectly, can get his allies appointed to key military positions in the enemy army and key positions in the enemies council. You start to gradually increase your influence indirectly through your allies that have infiltrated the enemy.

Phase two: once you have your pawns in place a full on, and swift, take over will be simple.

[NOTE] The book doesn’t give examples on how to get your allies placed in bed with the enemy but if you are intelligent enough to pull this off then you are intelligent enough to figure it out. I believe the lack of examples is because it’s highly situational. I find that referring to the 48 Laws of Power can help here.

– Be careful to make sure your power grabs remain under the radar for as long as possible. The opposition can’t defend against an attack he doesn’t see coming.

– Timing is everything. Moving at the right time, or at the wrong time, can affect the end outcome. Timing is not to be overlooked.

– Propaganda is useful, use it to your advantage.

– Once you have taken over the opposition you must put in place safeguards that will secure your new power position.


 


Defense

– You cannot always avoid confrontation nor can you always pick the time and place and therefore you must always be prepared for the worst case scenario at all times.

– The following measures can help safeguard your power:

– 1) Know the overall context of your power and the ensuing strategic consideration in its basic and interrelated facets

– 2) Establish a system of deterrence embedded in the tailored laws and rules

– 3) Manifest a system of deterrence backed by the power to punish

– 4) Continue the process of assimilating incipient oppositions

– 5) Defuse trouble spots and attack when necessary

– One of the best ways to maintain power is to make people dependent on you. It is much harder to control people that don’t need you.

– It may be better to be feared than loved but accomplish both and retaining your power will be much easier.

– Those who can’t be bought can be intimidated, those who can’t be intimidated can be bought. Very few are resistant to both.

– If you know you can’t stop dissidents from rising then seek to control instead of eliminating them. Subtly manipulate them into supporting causes that pose no threat to you.

– If you recognise an offence forming against you, a pre-emptive attack, assuming you have the numbers, can be a sound decision.

– If the opposition is strong then instigating a conflict between the opponent and another third party can work well. The third party will weaken the opposition for you. Better yet if the third party doesn’t realise you instigated it and is simply a pawn. Make sure, however, the third party doesn’t grow too strong if he wins and starts posing a threat to you.

– Remember, all these tactics work as well for the king as they do for the office executive. Calibration of tactics is key. Also, refer to The 48 Laws of Power and The 36 Stratagems.


 


Opportunist

– Opportunist don’t see people as good or bad but simply useful or not useful.

– They are constantly on the look out for opportunities that can help them accumulate more power.

– They are not above creating situations that can lead to opportunities.

– The opportunist will wait when a conflict breaks out, see who the likely winner is, and then align with them in order to gain favour with the victor once the war is over.

– They are often “middlemen” of sorts playing both sides to see who will benefit them the most.

– While playing both sides the opportunist is going to ensure to be the perfect courtier (Law 24) and to keep their hands clean (Law 26) to avoid suspicion.

– The opportunist is like a master chess player, he always plans several moves ahead.

– The opportunist thrives in chaos as chaos creates many opportunities in which the opportunist can then exploit.

– The supreme example of an opportunist is the character of Petyr “Littlefinger” Baelish from the Game of Thrones series on HBO.


 


Coalition

– History has shown that sooner or later allies ultimately become enemies.

– An ally will sometimes stab you in the back if it is in his best interest to do so especially if the ally is another person of power or person of much ambition.

– You should consider precautionary measures before voluntarily entering into an alliance.

– 1) Figure out if outside help is essential for your specific purpose at hand. Unless circumstances leave no alternative then it’s usually preferable to not seek an alliance. Be wary of making an alliance with a person who does not need you and is also powerful as they could just be using you only to discard you when they are done. They could even be indirectly taking over your power foundation.

– 2) If you do plan to make an alliance then be sure to establish a prior agreement as to what each member must contribute at all points of the alliance. Be suspicious of those who dont want to make a commitment and to those who promise you the moon. Both types are unreliable.

– 3) Maintain constant vigilance to ensure everything is going according to plan. If one ally seems to be intentionally getting to far out of line be sure to take steps to correct or compensate for this.

– 4) Take steps to ensure your ally isn’t simply using you to destory their enemies before turning on you to destory you. If you plan on uisng that stragety to destory someone then plan as if they are aware of your scheme.

– 5) Conduct your operation in such a way that at the time of the joint victory your own resverves and system are not so unbalanced that your competitive position is impoverished. The closer to victory against the common foe you stand, the more closeely should you scrutinize your own fortunes, adjust your balance, and toughen your resilience.


 


VECTORING RESOURCES


Parapropritary control

– The prelude to power in modern times is the battle for social or organizational positions, which constitute the decision-making loci governing resources. No chief of state owns the mens he directs; no banker the money he manipulates, no bishop the heaven he promises, but they all act as if they do. Such is the common state of affairs in a paraproprietary society.

– There are two considerations to keep in mind as you try to move upwards in a paraproprietary society

– 1) The number of positions available within the inner circle. When on the outside trying to get in it can often be eaiser to convience the powers at be to enlarge the circle and create a new position rather than trying to displace someone already in the circle thus taking their position. You can also try to convience the powers that be to open up a different and new position that has the powers you want and then give that position to you.

– Once you become a member of the inner circle you should support moves to further restrict the membership. Sharing power is not only a loss of personal power but a threat to what power is left.

– 2) Within the inner circle will be different positions all with different amounts of power. Decide which is the best for your goals and keep an eye on it.


 


People

– First step on path to power to to assemble a well-knit cadre backed by follwers beyond that in numbers adequate for the attainment for the next two milestones. Be VERY cautious about trying to go anywhere without this cadre and be VERY cautious about trying to reach for power beyond the strength of the platform you have constructed.

– Ceaser is a great example. Through his charm and persuasion he gained much credit and favor with many of the senators and through his festivals he gained favor of the people.

– In general, the magnitude of power in your hands is a direct function of the size of your constituency.

– Strive to increase the number of constituents you have.

– Strive to make all you constituents feel a sense of belonging to the orginization. The also need to feel like you are one of them and that you understand them.

– Minimize the overt expression of superiority by one segment of your followers over another. Example: A roman general ordered that slaves be added to the army to increase numbers and passed law forbidding any roman to belittle the slaves.

– Know and understand the people who follow you so that you can better persuade and control them.

– Continue to strengthen cadre by finding capable people and adding them in.

– Make sure to continue to keep an eye on the cadre though and stop a power struggle before it begins.

– If a person is doing a good job but is threatening you power and you must let him go its often better to do it with “face-saving honors” so he keeps his dignity and you dont create an enemy. However, sometimes its best to make an example of out this person so others fear trying to step up to your power.


 


Money

– The more corrupt a society the more money you need to control to gain and maintain power.

– The less money you have/control the more well versed in manipulation, deceit, and warefare you must be to ovecome the lack of money.

– People who have risen to power often had to borrow, beg, and steal to get money they needed.

– In modern America “Super PACs” are a great example. The Canidate doesn’t own that money but controls millions of dollars worth of donations that he can use to further his cause.


 


Indentitive Inducements

– Money is an important factor in attracting and keeping good talent but its not always the only factor.

– Prestige symbols such as reputation, feelings of achievement, publicity, and status symbols often work as well.

– There exist three types if motivation

– Indentitive: prestige symbols

– Utilitarian: granting and withholding of material things

– Coercive: the threat of injury or other punishment

– Generally, indentitive is better than utilitarian which is better than coercive.

– Find out what a perons motivations are and you can find out the best way to control them.


 


Push & Pull

– Instruments for inducing action can be divided into the push and the pull.

– Instruments of Push deter action by uisng fear of punishment or injury.

– Instruments of pull offers gains and rewards such as compliments, bonuses, etc.

– Strive to make the gains you give aligned with your goals. Examples: The king offers a Knight a large tract of land if the king wins the war. The office executive offers a bonus if the project his men are working on wins the contract.

– The progressive series in the push pulling of power is: 1) Killing the target individuals, 2) eliminating them, 3) damaging them, 4) threatening them, 5) cajoling them, 6) bribing them, 7) persuading them, 8) seducing them, 9) attracting them, and 10) educating them to your view.

– Generally you should use the more non-violent ones at the end of the spectrum. If effective they usually result in less backlash.

– In pearlious sutations you will sometimes have to resort to the more violent ones. Most people can either be bribed, intimidated, or seduced.


 


SHAPING COMMUNICATIONS


Need to Know

– Only give information to those with a direct need for it else it may fall (or be leaked) into the wrong hands.

– Only give them as much information as they can process so they dont get overwhelmed. Once processed then give them the rest.

– Information is power so you want to control the flow of information regarding you and your operations.

– If trying to usurp someone you must control the amount of information they have. Keep them in the dark, feed them false information, make them confused even.

– The manipulation of information given to the constituency is essential to stay in power.

– If they feel the future is 100% certenly going to be positive and prosperious they are less likley to surrender power to you. If, however, you give them small does of anxiety and uncertnetly, you can retain power over them by making them believe only you can lead them to prosperity.


 


Private Channels

– Be careful of your inner-cricle only telling you what they think you want to hear or worse, only what they want you to hear.

– Be sure to set up communication channels that bypass your staff so you can get accurate information. You want to know whats really going on and what people really think and feel.

– Remember, people trying to usurp you will attempt to limit the amount of correct information that you are getting.


 


I hope you enjoyed Part #2 of the Craft of Power Summaries and again I want to thank my friend warped_mindless


 

Dangers of Academic Papers - Machiavellianism in Politics - a Review

Academic Research Machiavellianism Power in Politics


 


As you know I am an advocate of academic research papers about the Dark Triad, Power, Machiavellianism & Psychology, and in this article I outline the dangers of said academic papers.


WARNING! This is very dry (I am talking Sahara-I-want-to-drink-my-own-piss-Bear-Grylls-style-dry) and if you are looking for hands-on information, applicable to real life situations, I recommend you check out my 48 laws of power summaries.


This article was written to highlight the dangers of academic research and why you need to be skeptical even when reading high quality research papers by people who dedicated their whole lives researching the topic at hand.


 


Analysis of the following academic research paper:


http://wikileakssudbury.org/WKL/E-December-14.pdf


found via the reputable academic database “Refseek.com” found within my resource list.



Title:


Politician personality, Machiavellianism, and political skill as predictors of performance ratings in political roles


 


Authors:


Jo Silvester (1), Madeline Wyatt (2), and Ray Randall (3)

(1) Cass Business School, City University London UK,

(2) Kent Business School UK, University of Kent, UK

(3) School of Business & Economics, University of Loughborough, UK


 


A few searches via a web search engine revealed that all three of the authors are not students but actual experts or at least self-proclaimed experts on the field, having dedicated parts of their research effort in their academic careers to the research of the topic at hand (Machiavellianism). Not a huge one though but enough to take their study into consideration and not dismiss it without a second thought. What might be a mistake, if you read my conclusion.


Jo Silvester is a female chartered psychologist who attained three titles in her field (PhD; MSc; BSc), specialised in the assessment and development of leadership. Since 2002 she is a professor of Occupational Psychology. Her studies led her to develop a unique competence based personality for both the conservative party (2001-2002) and the liberal party (2009). Also a strong background of research on the valuable topic of diversity.


Dr. Madeline Wyatt is another Occupational Psychologist currently lecturing in the HR-management sector. She too is a woman with a psychology degree and an interest and background in the research of diversity.


Dr. Ray Randall, another academic who did his duty in the research of occupational psychology and helped develop various tests related to occupations in both private economy as well as politics. Unlike the other authors he never was involved with “diversity” but solely focused on skills & competence in various sectors, judging all genders equally.


The aim of the study was to make the performance of politicians tangible and quantifiable. The second objective was finding out a relation between the performance and the level of extroversion, neuroticism, conscientiousness, Machiavellianism & political skills, both self-reported of 231 politicians (n=231), 185 of them were also judged by their colleagues (n=729) and officers (n=729), of said politicians.


During the course of the study five latent factors emerged: Resilience (to be referred to as RS), Politicking, Relating to Others, Analytical Skills (AS), Representing People.


The following assumptions were made, based on the frequently explored question of the relationship between personality & politics in the field of political psychology ((Jost & Sidanius, 2004): Personality influences Political Performance (cf. Dietrich, Lasley, Mondak, Remmel, & Turner, 2012; Mondak, Hibbing, Canache, Seligson, & Anderson, 2010; Simonton, 1998; Winter, 1998).

It is a pretty good bet to assume that personality does in fact influence, well, anything, but the authors made the discovery that there has not been done any research regarding the correlation between self-rated personality traits and performance. This posed the first question to be answered by the study.


To answer this question, the authors looked towards the comprehensive studies having been done in the field of occupational psychology and employee performance from industrial-organization (I/O) (e .g., Barrick & Mount, 1991; Schmidt & Hunter, 2004).


Of interest to the academics was whether politicians, from the United Kingdom, with a certain degree of performance shared a similar mental model. The second question to be answered by this study was (as mentioned above) whether self-rated personality traits may be used as a basis to predict the politician’s behaviour.


The study was done as a reaction to the request (e.g., Best, 2011; Dietrich et al., 2012; Simonton, 1998) for studies in the field of occupational psychology combined with political behaviour containing a large n-sample.


Studies about political performance ultimately lead to the problematic question of: What the actual fuck is political performance and how do you measure it? What constitutes bad performance and what good performance?

Can the poll and election results be used as a proper indicator of performance? According to a study (Lodge, Steenbergen & Braus, 1995) they can’t because they will be influenced by the performance of the party they are running for with a certainty matching irrefutable laws of physics.

This leads us to a benefit of being a politician. Unlike a manager you are not rated based on data and hard facts, (Armey & Murphy, 1998) but have the freedom to define the pillars of the performance you are measured and judged on upon yourself (March & Olsen, 1999; Morrell & Hartley, 2006; Sylvester, 2012).


Conscientiousness is said to be the most consistent factor influencing performance (Barrack & Mount, 1991; Salgado, 1997). The more conscientious a person is, the more likely he is going to be goal oriented, reliable able to wither the storm of failure. Navigating in complex ambiguous environments such as the political landscape requires self-motivation and persistence. (Morrell & Hartley, 2006; Simpson, 2008).


Extroverted individuals are more outgoing that introverts ((Costa & McCrae, 2006) what has a positive impact on the likelihood of campaigning, signing petitions and attending rallies (Anderson, 2009; Monday et al., 2010; Vecchione & Caprara, 2009)


Neuroticism is a negative trait for a politician to possess because being anxious is detrimental for political performance.


Political Skill is of importance for charming & manipulating people, webbing networks and is an important factor influencing political and managerial performance. (Andrews, Kalmar, & Harris, 2009; Gentry, Gilmore, Shuffler, & Leslie, 2012; Todd, Harris, Harris, & Wheeler, 2009)


Machiavellianism, a skill needing no further introduction but still receiving one, is the likelihood of a person to attempt to manipulate other people for his own gain (Christie & Gees, 1970, Biberman, 1985; Drory & Gluskinos, 1980; Grams & Rogers, 1990). Machiavellianism according to the definition of the word, influence political performance positively. This is not necessarily the case (Deluga, 1998; Pillai, Williams, Lowe, & Jung, 2003) for electorial results, because voters prefer a candidate who comes across as trustworthy. Hence the modern prince must at least give the impression of being honest, while concealing his true intentions (Me, 2016). A hypothesis of this study was, that Machiavellianism would most likely have a negative influence on political performance.


 


To summarize the method and research question:


1) Competency analysis of how behaviour and personality traits are affecting political performance.

2) Testing the connection between various performances constructs that politicians with a certain skill degree share.

The candidate’s questions were all politicians and employed officers in local authorities.



Results:


Politicians share similar ideas about what constitutes political performance.

Their general hypothesis was true and personality traits as well as character did indeed influence perceived performance.

The hypothesis that conscientiousness influences political performance was partly true.

Extroversion, just like Narcissism, led the politician to estimate their performance level much higher than it actually was perceived.

A correlation between Machiavellianism and self perceived PK has been proven, as well as a negative effect on self-rated RS, RP, and RO.

Agreeableness has been shown to be beneficial for Representing people, but negative for Politicking (PK).

Openness has no influence on anything. But another result of the study “determined” the following, a little contradictory statement:

Apparently Politicking (secrecy, dishonesty and a lust for political blood sport) is a negative trait for politicians. Yeah, you absolutely should tell politicians, that they need to stop concealing their intentions and say more than necessary. That they need to avoid competition in the form of political maneuvering, acquiring and maintaining power, as well as dishonesty…


Neuroticism, conscientiousness, and political skill correlated significantly with politician RS and AS. There also seems to be a correlation between conscientiousness, agreeableness, Machiavellianism, and PK, though not significant.

RO wasn’t influenced by any personality trait.

Extroversion did not significantly correlate with political performance (tell that to all the introverts running the country. What? Can’t find any? Tough luck… While I do agree that introversion does have various benefits regarding skills like forging alliances and projecting calmness, they are not unique to introverts and can be seen with many introverts. But hey, I do not have 3 titles in valuable fields like occupational psychology or diversity, so what do I know?)

Politicians who are deemed good performers have the following traits: More resilient (no research was done on the question if they are merely resilient or anti-fragile but it would not come as a surprise to me if the researchers are not familiar with Nazism Nicholas Taleb), able to represent others and a highly developed Analytical Skill.

The results, while superficially insightful, lead me to my criticism of this study.


Criticism:


Despite this being one of the most comprehensive studies, the sample was relatively small and one must not draw an eager conclusion based upon this study, presenting it as a fact. While the method used seems accurate, there is no guarantee that 1) the politicians answered and assessed themselves accurately and 2) that the observers who judged the politicians were able to give an accurate judgment.


Regarding the notion that extroversion doesn’t have a positive effect on political performance: You should totally tell that to all the introverts running the country. What? Can’t find any? Tough luck… While I do agree that introversion does have various benefits regarding skills like forging alliances and projecting calmness, they are not unique to introverts and can be seen with many introverts. But hey, I do not have 3 titles in valuable fields like occupational psychology or diversity, so what do I know? Do you know if the people who proclaimed themselves to be extroverts have been judged by others to be introverts because they appear calm and quiet? I can only recommend the authors to read up on stoicism. Mediations by Marcus Aurelius would be an excellent start.


What about different countries? Different social background? Parties they belong to? Other personality traits like being proactive or the IQ? These questions have not been answered but in my opinion are a huge indicator for political effectiveness.

Ergo one can conclude that this study offers valuable insight into a small, specialized segment of British politicians that may or may not be applied to other slightly different environments. Further research is required and this study is unable to give a definite answer to the questions asked by the occupational psychology & diversity researchers.

So can we conclude that this study was a failure? Yes and no. Yes for mankind, no for the researches since in the last paragraph before the acknowledgments they give the real reason for their study. The aim was not necessarily to answer the call for bigger, more expression ate studies in this sector it actually was, and I quote the researchers:

“to increase awareness of the importance of political work. Classical political theorists and historians, such as Aristotle, Plato, and Machiavelli, devoted considerable attention to what constitutes good democratic leadership and how it might be achieved (Glad, 2002). By continuing this work and studying politicians as political workers, we argue that I/O psychologists could bring a unique perspective to one of the most important questions for the 21st century, namely how can elected representatives deliver good government?”


What does this tell us, what can we take away from this study? It is not a study one can look towards hoping his questions to be answered in a satisfactory way but we can draw an irrefutable connection between this study and the work – of Florentine strategist and father of political science as well as Realpolitik- The Prince. Its main purpose is a job application.

Now some individuals may argue that despite this commonality there also are a lot of differences, one being that The Prince already prepares the magnificent Lorenzo Di Medici that The Prince must not only to be seen as a manual for a ruler who wants to both acquire and maintain power, but also a job application. This study doesn’t reveal its real purpose, the attempt to increase the value of their current jobs, until the very last page.

Now this obvious fact doesn’t make the results of the study untrue, though the criticism I gave does devalue it and the study must be read while taking into account all of my posed questions.


 


Congratulations, you now know why to not trust everything someone with a couple of fancy titles says and you really belong to the elite inner circle of Machiavellians, since digging through such an article demands dedication and highlights your interest for the art of power.

Tuesday 17 May 2016

Triple Q&A of Power & Machiavellianism

Modern Machiavelli iAMA


 


Welcome, this is a summary of the Triple Q&A commenced at the start of May, featuring me, Illacertus and IllimitableMan on http://reddit.com/r/the48lawsofpower.


I have summarized the most valuable parts and separated them into the following categories:


  1. Business & Career Warfare

  2. Politics

  3. Power, Philosophy, etc.

  4. Charisma & Seduction

NOTE: Since this exceeded 10.000 words I have yet to have found time to correct spelling mistakes and put the questions into the correct order. It will follow soon. Thank you for your understanding.


Since all three of us have answered questions, I decided to add the acronyms of the person responding to the question. MM = me, Lionel Fox from http://modernmachiavelli.com, IL = Illacertus from http://illacertus.com, IM = IllimitableMan from http://illimitablemen.com.


Part 1: Career Warfare


Part 2: Politics


Part 3: Misc


Part 4: Charisma


Part 5: Guest Answers


 


Question: How does one get their mind in shape. Controlling their emotions, becoming mindful, mentally acute and self-disciplined. How do you control your facial expressions, body language and talkativeness.


Answer (user Seducer4Real):


Here are 3 things I do to achieve the above:


  1. Read books everyday. I do about 20-30 minutes daily. Sometimes more on other days. The key here is to keep it consistent. Even if you do 10 minutes a day, keep it consistent. Don’t try to start reading 1 book a day/week. Build it up.

  2. Work out. If your body is in shape, your mind will benefit from it as well. I recommend you workout at least 3 times a week. If you’re not the type that wants to build muscle, then look into doing other sports such as boxing/martial arts that will also keep you in shape.

  3. This is a tip I learned from one of the greatest copywriters and business strategist – Gary Halbert. Essentially, you walk 1 hour a day at least 5 days a week. First few weeks will be hard but once you are used to it you will crave it like a cigarette, and unlike a cigarette, it is healthy for you.

You should get started with the above 3 for now to achieve mental clarity. Once you have those 3 in place, you will come up with your own techniques. Also, don’t replace working out with walking or vice versa, you do BOTH. 1 Hour walking per day plus working out 3-5 times a week.


Facial Expressions: Look at yourself in the mirror. Have an imaginary conversation and see what facial expressions you produce. You’ll learn a lot this way.


Body language: Don’t fidget when talking to someone. When talking use your hands to emphasise what you are saying. This makes you look more attractive and can create more trust between you and the other person. Make eye contact when talking. Try not to touch your neck/face/hair as it makes you look nervous. Don’t be reaching to your phone/pockets every few seconds.


Talkativeness: Don’t overdo it and don’t underdo it. Realise when it is a good time to speak, when to stfu & listen and when to give short replies. Most people are not interested in hearing your voice so you should be asking specific questions to get them talking. In other words, be a good listener and use wha they tell you to create conversation. Don’t always make them the centre of the conversation, instead relate your own knowledge/stories of that topic to them. If you’re with a few people you’ll have to judge when it is a good time to interject. Pro Tip: Don’t be quiet when you are in a group of people, you’ll just look weird/antisocial.


 


Question: How does one become a psychopath?


Do you believe that every German who pulled the gas lever in Auschwitz was a psychopath? Absolutely not. A man can murder millions of people and not feel bad about himself if he is blessed with a certain skill.


Rationalization


Women are experts at rationalising and men will have to work a little harder to acquire the skill. Fortunately, it lies in our modi operandi to not think bad about ourselves, for we are blessed with both our best friend & worst enemy, the ego.


Criminals who murdered for no good reason will always believe that deep inside they are actually good people, forced only by the mean enviroment to commit atrocious crimes.


Another helpful ability is meditation to detach you from your feelings and stoicism to remain calm and emotionless.


Master these 3 skills, sprinkle in a little reckless bravery and you have the perfect dish for psychopathy.


 


Question: What so you think is the motive for law # 1 in Greene’s book to be Don’t outshine the master?


When he wrote the book he surely didn’t let some random function dictate the order of the laws. They say the first and the last elements of a list are those that are more remembered.


Answer (IL): As you rightfully point out the author starts and ends his book with much thought. Law #1 is the first law almost everyone seems to break. We get into the business world with much euphoria and the attitude that we’re going to prove ourselves one of the best employees available on the market. We’re going to rise up the ranks fast and have a career our parents can be proud of. We’re naive and to a certain extent arrogant.


We don’t realize that many authorities rise to their ranks for the thrill of control, which they falsely belive is power. They’re managers, they’re not leaders. Either way, they have fragile egos, lots of insecurities, failed dreams and here you come – the greenhorn. The young adult who always has a positive attitude, who outworks everyone and learns fast. You’re a threat and you will be dealt with. It’s our ignorance and belief in the lies we’ve been fed that makes most of us walk right into outshining our masters, may that be superiors or merely colleagues. You’ll face resentment without understanding it. It’s pathetic.


Greene finished with Law 48 Assume Formlessness, which basically lets you understand not everything is set in stone and you have to know when to adapt to change and go with the tide, reforming instead of letting your rigidity be your downfall as we’ve seen with the Spartans. Simply put, you’re almost done reading the book and Greene tells you they’re different strategic moves on the chessboard. The experienced chess player will know the right move to make at the right time against the right opponent and alter his playstyle when necessary. You develop that ability through mastery.


Difference between Leader & Manager: One difference that will make you fill in the blanks would be that a manager will order a job to be done and the employee will obey, because he has to, out of fear and anxiety, always relying on his next paycheck. The leader inspires his followership to do something, because they want to do it. He does not micromanage, but lets them free under his guidance. They pursue goals based on their own will to do it. One forces you, the other does not decide for you and offers a take it or leave it approach. Leadership in the office is difficult to pull off, because of the structure one is in. You’re surrounded by people who don’t like their job, but depend on it. It does not matter what way you’d try to frame it. They can tell the difference between honey and salt.


The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.


If you can pull off to demonstrate to your victim that he in fact is delusional, then that would work. Normally they’re so deep into their own reality that one cannot reach them. Imagine telling Kanye West he’s an idiot by showcasing his failures to him. He wouldn’t fall out of the clouds, because of that.


 


Question: Do you have any morals you live by?


Answer (IL): Indeed, if we weren’t we wouldn’t be holding this AMA or doing the work that we do, that is beneficial to many. If it were all just about money, I would be doing something else. I began to educate people on these topics like a Kung Fu master trains his students in the hopes they would use it to protect themselves better. Maybe one of 50 will learn only to bully others, but if that means the other 49 can defend themselves I’m happy. Also, if someone needs precise instructions in order to be dangerous, they’re not a real threat to begin with.


One thing I know the three of us share is loyalty. Quite contradictory to Machiavellian beliefs, but what is a man worth, when he speaks unmeaning words even to his own brethren?


Answer (MM):


Politics have no relations to morals


  • Niccolò Machiavelli

 


Question: A woman I know sends me mixed signals, but often when she spots me in the room, goes and talks to the nearest guy she can find. I’m a bit perplexed by this behavior. Is it an instinctive jealousy causing ploy? Should I mirror her behavior and hit on other girls? Or is she doing what PUA’s do – appear social so I can also talk to her like one of the other guys?


Answer (MM): 


a) She is trying to fitness test you by making you jealous


b) you are a creep


Answer (Seducer4Real): Don’t talk to her again until she approaches you out of her own will. Don’t make eye contact either or make it obvious that she you have noticed her in a particular area. She’s obviously one of those girls that just ‘goes with the flow’ and talks to anyone. You just happened to be one guy she spoke to and believe that she has feelings for you. Best thing to do here is to just ignore her and talk to other girls(and in about 90% of your women-related problems).


 


Question: I have some friends, or at least I thought, but it turns out most of those so called “friends” are the same ones shit talking about me behind my back agreeing with the consensus of things said about me that I’m working on changing, such as: always sound unsure/confused, asks the stupidest questions, socially awkward, etc.


My question is in regards to law 5, 6, and 18. My reputation is important and apparently it isn’t as great as I thought it is. With that, should I retreat socially and finish working on my self, or “court attention” and continue going to social events with my “friends” while working on myself?


Answer (user Warped_Mindless): Im the admin over at MPUAForum and we encounter a lot of men in this suitation. What always works the best is to cut ties from your old friends and make new ones keeping in mind the reputation you want you new friends to have of you.


True friends wouldn’t talk shit about you anyways, they would offer their hand to help you. People like that are rare, however, but they exist.


 


Question: How do you think one can bring together and convinced to cooperate for their own good, a large group of marginalized, mostly poor and vulnerable, also chronically suspicios and rather always envious of each other?


It is about convincing emarginated and socially unprotected workers in the care for the elderly. They are mostly immigrants, usually treated with suspicion and often exploited. This environment generates a lot of unhappiness and low self esteem. Their reaction is to defend themselves aggregating according to nationality, family, religion, bit many are isolated and there is an entire culture of acceptance of a miserable life which nourishes sentiments of despair, hatred, depression, self abuse, victim like mentality, sometimes delinquence.


Note: there is no money to pay them for it, no premise of power over them, no immediate reward.


Oh, it’s actually about convincing them that working in solidarity will make their life better and more secure. It’s difficult like hell, as they’re mostly scared, demoralized and suspicious. I do not have any brilliant manipulative skills and neither do I look forward to acquire them. I was just curious on what you think about what can bring such people together. I can understand that working relentlessly over decades -as do some priests – might come to build a community, but I do not have that time.


Answer (MM + IL): Sounds like you don’t need manipulation, but leadership skills. Obviously, you want them to work together as a team, but they’re unmotivated. Have you tried explaining to them how and why it’s in their own best interest to work together? In other words do they fully grasp the mission at hand and what lies in it for them? I’m afraid we do need more insight in order to give more precise answers.


How do you convince people to work together?


Either you create an outside enemy. Tell them that they must work against a common enemy and for a shared goal.


Or you find out what they want and let it dangle in front of them like the carrot on a stick.


You win some, you lose some. People with such a fatalistic attitude are difficult to motivate. Them forming groups is an obvious reaction since this is human behaviour 101.


I would try to create the vision of a beautiful goals in their heads and tell them that in order to achieve said goal, they will need to work together. Or do the same with negative disaster scenarios. Fear is an excellent motivator.


Then your leadership and mediation comes into play. Organize events where you make sure that they come in contact and realise that they share a lot in common.


Over emphasise the commonalities and ignore the differences.


Maybe thinking about what motivates people will lead you to achieve your goal. The biggest factors are:


  • The possibility of benefits & recognition

  • The fear of loss & pain

 


Question: How do you put yourself in a good mindset in order to boost your creativity when there is social pressure against it. For example, in a meeting, you want to be very creative in persuading person A to make a choice that favors you. In the meeting there, person B and C that wouldn’t like that choice being made by person A and they know that applying social pressure against you would make you not confortable and creative in your speech. My creativity seems to come when either I’m very confortable with what I’m doing and especially there’s an imminent threat that needs to be adressed.


In other words, how can you make yourself be very confortable with everything you do despite social pressure?


Answer (MM): Creativity is snake oil and does not exist.


Creativity is a function of knowledge, experience, intelligence, mind set and your current mood.


How do you get comfortable? Stoicism & Confidence


 


Question: Robert Greene once said “In the end, the more capricious you appear, the more respect you will garner.”


Do you agree with him? Why or why not?


Answer (IL): I disagree with the way you phrase that question. If I recall correctly that quote is from the 48 Laws of Power. The whole book is divided into 48 laws, which apply at all times, but at the right circumstances. Hence, it’s true, but not always. Wheather or not that’s the right strategy for you to take is a different question. Almost every law has a reversal at the end of the chapter, which means it can all backfire and go horribly wrong if you fail to assess the situation correctly. To be unpredictable has its benefits as it has the power to intimidate, but there’s a lot of situations in which you want to appear predictable and harmless. So, it’s not a matter of agreeing or disagreeing.


 


Question: How do you decide when your attempts at attacking/ defending someone should stop? Is there a point where it would be wiser to give in keeping in mind that your reputation will not be affected(or maybe just a little) ? This is coming from the perspective that time is money which could be spent doing something else that would yield you a lot more value(as opposed to continuing your attack/defense) ?


Answer (MM): Base your calculations on experience and possible outcomes. Assess the risk and decide.


Read up on Game Theory and visit /r/gametheory/ as well as /r/gamesandtheory


Also follow /u/ridik_ulass who is an excellent game theorist and strategist as well as a mod for multiple useful subreddits.


 


Question: What is charm, and how can you develop it? Any good resources?


Answer (MM): Charme and Charisma are closely tied together but there still are a few differences, though so minor that we are going to ignore them for the sake of this post.


Charme is important to charm your opposite, be it male or female, into agreeing with you. One could say that charme makes people say yes. Even if you didn’t ask a question.


There are a few things that play together:


  • Your attractiveness level, including grooming, smell, clothing.

  • Your power & status, but also knowledge and expertise fall under this category.

  • Authority & calmness

  • Your body language & confidence.

  • Your humour.

  • Empathy & your presence in the here and now. Ergo listening without becoming distracted.

  • Your agreeability and likableness.

There is no denying that a powerful person always has more charme than his inferiors. There have been studies where actors assumed the same body language and were equally attractive, were paired up against a powerful person. The effects of charme and humour were measured and it turned out that the powerful person scored much better.


Now how can you learn to be more charming? My book recommendations that cover every important aspect would be:


This covers everything except for humour but I fear I can not help you with that. In my opinion, you either have humour, or you don’t but many people claim that humour is a learnable skill. Anyway, it was never of interest to me but I am sure that you will find some sources teaching the art of humour.


 


Question: What is a good resource for learning the different types of charisma?


Answer (MM): They are all explained in The Charisma Myth. I didn’t get a lot out of reading it and in my opinion, it is a little hyped, but still makes for a good read since there are few reliable sources (not talking about 7 step self-help hippie bullshit gurus) about Charisma.


 


Question: Have any of you read “Trust me im lying: Confessions of a media manipulator” and if so would you reccomend it, and what are your thoughts about the current US elections?


 


Answer (MM): Over at /r/illimitablemen we recently had a little discussion about manipulating the media. Since this subreddit is confidential I can not share what I wrote but here is the little part about the book:


I haven’t read the book and have no intention of reading it, since I am not the biggest Ryan Holiday fan. He recommends to start with the smallest companies and work your way up? Sounds fucking retarded and not a valuable strategy if you really want to leave a dent. I haven’t been aware that Ryan Holiday is supposedly THE guru to turn to for political PR. Gave me a good laugh. Anyway, what I do have is [… little later someone posted his concept of trading up the chain A joke of an Wikipedia article that should be removed as soon as possible since it is obvious that this was solely written for the backlinks and poses no relevance to nothing]


Choose the smallest platform and pray for it to get whispered down the lane? Marvellous idea! Someone give that guy a Nobel Prize. Of course, there are numerous cases where this did happen. But you must be one huge retard to rely on it. This is the last resort and only valuable if you have 0 connections and no inclination to build any.


Listen to people who have real and not merely theoretical knowledge. They all believe Ryan to be an imbecile, which is even worse considering that Ryan is the apprentice of Robert Greene. […] Yesterday I watched the (amazing) football game with [someone] and I asked for their PR book recommendations, having this thread in mind. 5 out of 5 said that they never read PR books on a regular basis. [one guy] said that he hasn’t even read a book about PR since his studies. PR is interesting in the sense that it is is nothing you can really learn from books. The books that come closest are books about war & strategy.


Anyway, we did come up with some good books, especially propaganda minister Joseph Goebbel’s favourite: Edward Bernays, Propaganda (get this even if not employed in the PR sector). Other good books by him: Public Relations, Crystallizing Public Opinion & Engineering of Consent.


Number 2 is Ansgar Zerfaß, though his books are way too expensive for the average, mentally healthy person. Edit: Pirates yohaaay [link removed]. All of the Zerfaß books are excellent and he covered a wide range of topics and you should choose the book accordingly. Be it trends, research, crisis communication, strategic communications, Online PR, spin doctoring etc.


I would not recommend him if you merely want to get your feet wet, since he has very advanced material and charges accordingly. This excellent book about strategic communication for example. Look at the price tag…


and the third one is Guerilla PR 2.0. by Michael Levine. Comprehensive and updated for the modern environment.


Answer 2: People have been slinging dirt at Hillary for years, so she is used to it. But I have the feeling that Donald Trump, unlike the rest of us, is not cooking with water, hence his dirt just might stick. On the other hand he is pretty far behind in the polls. Polls that are prone to errors and can drastically change given certain circumstances. Obama having Clinton’s back is terrible and will most likely influence the outcome to a certain degree.


Me, personally, I hope that Trump wins since it is better for Russia and therefore better for Europe. I am sick of seeing European farmers, as well as many other professions, lose their job, just because the fucking American elite wants to play Cold War 2.0, and use a trade embargo against Russia.


All because of what? The Crimea? Fuck that, I couldn’t care less. Split the Ukraine up, give the part up to Lviv to the Austrian-Hungarian Empire and the rest to Russia.


 


Question: I’ve been reading up on the Art of Seduction and I noticed that Greene mentions that you can mix different seducer archetypes. This seemed interesting to me cause I’ve seen people do this irl with great results. This one person I know mixed certain aspects of the rake with the charismatic, which seems like great deception to me, because of the mix of a life’s purpose and no purpose/immorality, danger and leadership. It’s hard to figure out. Another person I know has mixed the charmer and the natural, with the result of being a very enjoyable person to talk to, but still very powerful. I’m fairly new to the game, so I’m still brainstorming, and thought this would be a good question not only for me but the whole forum: which seducer archetypes have you seen that mix well, and which fail completely?


Answer (IL): I love Greene. I like the Art of Seduction. I dislike personality categorisations. Is it possible to mix different seducer archetypes? Yes, absolutely. The ones that don’t mix are usually polar opposites. Since you’re new to game you’re not doing yourself any favors in my opinion studying these archetypes in such detail with such seriousness. Trying to emulate any of these types in a way that doesn’t feel natural to you will prove counterproductive and you’ll be asking yourself what you’re doing wrong. You see, what I’m trying to say is, this isn’t a perfect science. You could do anything with it and figure out your own style. You could be a rake on Monday and a natural on Tuesday. These archetypes aren’t set in stone.





That being said I believe I’d consider myself a good cross between a rake and a natural. In serious relationships I switch to the ideal lover. One that doesn’t naturally fit me is the dandy, the Russell Brand and Oscar Wilde type. They’re usually very articulate and cultured. They have a tendency to be gay, too. I have to add, though, unless you’re trying things out in the real world, constantly analyzing how well you’re doing with a certain approach, you’re wasting your time philosophizing. Plus, if you’re male and heterosexual, stay the fuck away from women who read books like this one, especially the coquette. Study the female archetypes to spot them, proceed at your own risk. You might be thinking you’ll just have a one-night stand and end up being falsely accused of rape or you might think you’re fooling around with her, friends-with-benefits-like and she punctures the condom to lock you down.


 


Question: Politics vs Business? Which one do you think is more powerful in America (or the world) or are they both equal in influence/power?


Answer (IL): That was a question I asked myself at some point and my decision-making boiled down to this. I would rather try and build my own business focusing on creating something positive & helpful, rather than fighting something negative & hurtful. Now, either way one is fighting for a good cause, however I prefer to do business. Although in many regards both are very similar. There’s plenty of things fucked up in the world like real injustice between races & the genders (not the ones pushed by the PC culture narrative & supported by the media, which in and of itself is a highly destructive movement / organized attack). One could engage in politics and try to make things right by weakening the parties who are the at the root of the problem or one builds a new structure through entrepreneurship that provides an alternative, something that is missing, but desparately needed in today’s world. The more you grow the more intertwined politics and business become, unless you’re on the business side of things and make a concious effort to stay away from politics like many companies do. They just back down, fire employee’s based off of a tweet, regardless of it being a joke. They’re all about profit, only. As always it depends on you and your goals.


 


Question: How would one go into building a cult of personalit?. I know it has a lot to due with laws 5 ( Protect Reputation at all cost) and law 27 (Cultlike Following), as well as a host of other laws (4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 16, 17, 25, 30, 32, 35-37, 40, 43 are all honorable mentions). Any books that could add to this?


Answer (IL): Study Apple (the cult) & Steve Jobs (the personality).


Also read;


  • Tribes by Seth Godin

  • Primal Branding by Patrick Hanlon

You’re better off building a “cult-like” following instead of a cult. One is building a personal brand with an audience – the other is creating a new religion. Basically, learn how to build a business.


It’s about entrepreneurship & your best bet is creating something valuable that will add to people’s lives. Be a great leader and people will follow you based on your actions.


Answer (MM):


Step 1) Unde Venis?


Where do you come from? Analyse your strengths and weaknesses. Do an SW Analysis


Step 2) Analyse the Terrain


Do an TO Analysis. Carefully evaluate the threats and opportunities, both on the micro- as also in the macro- environment


Step 3) Quo Vadis?


Where are you going? Decide exactly how you wish to be perceived.


Men in general judge more by the sense of sight than by the sense of touch, because everyone can see, but only a few can test by feeling. Everyone sees what you seem to be, few know what you really are.


Perception is reality


Step 4) Craft your Backstory


It has to be appealing to the public and give them a reason to like you. Terrific examples of background stories (you can combine them) are:


  • Reluctant Hero (Actually you do not want to be famous or have responsibility, but it was forced upon you nevertheless. You reluctantly agreed to accept the call of duty)

  • The Underdog (Everyone hates you, nobody gave you a chance)

  • Us vs. Them Dynamic (You have a mutual enemy and only you can save them)

Step 5) Spread your Message


Start the engine of the propaganda machine and spread your message via Marketing & PR channels and techniques.


Step 6) Evoke Emotions


  • Social Proof – Show that other people love you. Especially influential people

  • Trust – Bond and connect with others

  • Credibility & Expertise – If you don’t have it, borrow it from others

  • Repetition – Repeat that you are the greatest and soon both you and others will believe it. Repeat it often enough and you will be the double greatest

 


Question: What is the difference between Blue Pill & Red Pill guys and what is your take on How to win Friends & influence People?


Answer (IL): The main difference is – a “bluepill nice guy” (see Dr. Robert Glover’s work No More Mr Nice Guy for more information on the latter term) is not in the least attractive to women.


A blue piller is someone taking the easy way out, choosing to ignore the harsh reality and live in blissful ignorance, as seen in the matrix. He’d rather live believing comfortable lies, than embracing reality.


A nice guy is a lesser man who lacks ability and confidence when it comes to women. He will often find himself in the so-called “friend zone” because he submissively obeys women like a slave. He unintentionally kills the sexual and romantic interests of women ironically through the very actions and behavior that he thinks will make them fall for him. He wants to listen, understand and comfort women, while also sharply contrasting this by doing his best possible to avoid sexual tension or making a move on them. He avoids differing opinions / interests thinking that would make them have “less in common” and thus less compatible. When mistreated he won’t be able to tell a woman she is behaving wrong and/or improperly no matter how clearly she is.


How to Win Friends & Influence People is sugarcoating office politics & interpersonal relationships, where Greene is very blunt about it, but it is nonetheless one of the best self-improvement books. I personally recommend it. Out of 150’000 TRP subscribers some are going to be off every now and again, but they may just be on point when it comes to the topic of getting laid. I might apply Carnegie’s advice when talking to the CEO of our prime customer, but take a different approach with the hot waitress at the bar.


Answer (user JohnDoeDude): If I may add an answer I’d say the difference between a blue pill mice guy and a charming red pill man is on the quality of the transaction they engage in.


The blue pill guy does not have real power, so he uses kindness and generally being nice hoping to receive something back because of it. A blue pill nice guy heavily relies on the principle of reciprocity. He gives, but he can only hope to receive something back. Hence the motive for he always give more than he receives. People see that he has small power and also they see there are no real consequences for not giving back to the nice guy, he’s so nice how can he ‘punish’, right?


The charming red pill man has generally more real power than a nice guy, and even if he has small real power he knows how to better manage it.


He always knows he will receive something back for his niceness. He charms to improve the bargains he is in.


A blue pill man has to give all his commitment (read power) to the woman so he can hope to receive his good once-every-ten-days starfish sex.


The red pill charming man has to only open his mouth, say the things that must be said to charm his victims, heamplifies his positive traits and he amplifies the ego of the other person, so the other person is less rational, for the end result of: the other person which the charming man is bargain with perceives the charming man as higher as he actually is and at the same time the other person, being now less rational, will demand less than he would demand if he were more rational, hence a better bargain for the red pill charming man.


It’s like if a blue pill nice guy man wants to borrow some money he has to give everything to assure he will return them.


For the red pill charming man, he is able to borrow even more money, giving less assurances.


The core concept is about the transactional quality of every interaction humans engage in. The red pill charming man knows how to optimize the bargain always in favor of his side.


Don’t know if I made it clear enough, perhaps some of the three AMA owners can add something more clear. I’m not always good with explanations.


 


Question: If you were a teenager today just graduated from high school, but with all your current knowledge, what would you do/study/work?


Answer (MM):


Do:


  • Get engaged in politics

  • Network a lot because there nothing like too much networking or too many friends

  • Live in a foreign country all by yourself for a few months or even a year

Work: Politician, PR or Communication Consultant


Study: Law, PR or Communications


I ticked off all 3 points, hence I wouldn’t change too much growing up.


Answer (user Seducer4Real): What you ultimately want to do in life is monetise your passion. Your passion is the only thing you will happily work overtime for when necessary. If you can nail this, you will live a good life. What I’d recommend you do is get a job first. Try your best to find a job in something you enjoy. Something you wouldn’t hate. Maybe an office job? Or something related to your qualifications. Essentially, you don’t want to be too overworked at this job (you’ll find out in a second why). It should be something you like, pays decent and doesn’t drain your energy by the time you finish. Right, so you have your job now. What you also have is time after work. This is where the magic happens. You will now have income which you can use to pay for rent/food/ and anything else without much worry. With that system in place, it is time to FIGURE out how you’re going to monetise your passion. You will have to use your time very wisely. As I’m not sure what you are interested in, I can’t be too specific (PM me if you have any questions). I will assume you have identified your passion. If not, then don’t worry, every evening when you get back from work you will do your fucking research until you find out the one thing you will do that’ll make you forget to eat and shit. This might take a few days or few weeks. You will get it wrong a few times, but it is extremely important that you identify what your passion is(it can be very specific). If you get it wrong , dont worry, try again. From this point on, it’s all down to how well you do your research in the hours you’re not at work. It’s literally that simple. Research how others in your niche have made their money. Research what you can do to get started. Make a plan and start. Refine the plan. Take a break and look at what you’ve done. Review. Repeat. Research more. Stay up to date. Don’t listen to others if you know you’re right. Fuck the world. If you really want to make it you will. There it is, i gave it to you. It is now LITERALLY down to you to make it happen. Peace


 


Question: How have you applied these laws to your personal life?


Answer (IL): I’m careful not to step on anyone’s ego, be that a colleague or especially someone with authority, who prides himself with his status/position. I stopped trusting most people. I talk less & let akward silences sit without feeling the need to fill it with unmeaning words. I’m not as kind anymore. Many see it as a weakness. You basically invite them to believe you’re a “nice guy” they can step on. I stopped talking about future plans or things I haven’t done yet. It eliminates the possibility of sabotage. Once they notice your actions / accomplishments, e.g. that you’ve successfully outworked them / gone about improving yourself beyond their skills, they’re powerless, no matter how much insecurities you stepped on.


I mingle with others more instead of seeking isolation. You’re better off at the front, building and guarding your reputation. I try to avoid attention, but shine in a positive light, when it is forced on me. I avoid parasitical losers. I’ve tried to help them in the past only to find myself affected negatively by their misery. I avoid gossiping / taking sides at all times. I refuse to take a side and always stay neutral. The effect is that everyone feels like they can come and talk to you, open up and within record time you accumulate so much dirt on everyone around you, you’re the most informed and up to date person at your workplace / class / group.


Through my naive, innocent behaviour when first getting into the office I nailed that. You want to have people underestimate you. I’ll have my superiors take the credit for my work. They love you for it, become dependant on you & when push comes to shove, you already know exactly how to do certain parts of your boss’s job, since there’s nothing they love more, than delegate to someone who will deliver good quality work. I try to learn as much as possible from the managers & managers’ managers higher up in the hierarchy. Most of them are vain. Appeal to their self-interest, make them feel important. Don’t mistake this for arselicking. One is pathetic and will get you enemies among your coworkers, the other is subtle and best done when grabbing lunch together. You ask them, the last thing they’ll do is ask a lower employee for lunch without a reason. I control my emotions in public settings.


Can’t allow yourself to put your guard down. When people don’t appreciate you and you’re the one running shit, demonstrate that by taking a vacation leave. It has worked perfectly for me, when I had to deal with a parasitical coworker who tried to manipulate & cross me. I was very aware of what she was doing. She underestimated me. I dealt with her as subtly as possible. Some people, like her, dig their own graves and all you have to do is wait wth a smile on your face, when everybody hates working with them. It’s not a rarity. I want people to think I’m the innocent, young, naive, uninformed, little intern. They never suspect you could be a threat & as mentioned earlier, realize you’re outdoing them by miles, when it’s too late.


Be careful with appearances. People love to pretend they’re someone they’re not. Most people’s word doesn’t mean shit. They’re thinking something completely different. Also, I don’t answer honestly to personal questiosn like “What’s your plan for the future? Are you going to study?” I used to talk openly about my dreams, only to find out, I’d get resentment for not being the average joe who gets wasted every weekend. So, now I’m the average joe & repeat average joe shit to them, because I have to. I might be a bit of a romantic & think long-term relationships are possible, but the word “commitment” ends there. There’s no way I’ll let myself be trapped & just hand over all of my power to the naturally Machiavellian sex. See, there’s plenty of historical events where men used physical strength to fight with swords, but women, out of necessity, practiced the art of persuasion. There’s a power imbalance between the genders when it comes to sex. Commit & you’ve lost.


I always liked the idea of being royal in your own fashion. When I was an intern I gave no weight to my title. You don’t need a crown or a “senior” on your business card so people see who’s killing it. People choose a leader based on their actions. Your superiors might be managers, but that is not synonymous with leading. They have paid workers, not passionate followers. When something is for “free” I don’t want it. Even when you don’t pay with money, you will be expected to pay in another way. Most often that turns out to be a bigger struggle than the price you would’ve paid for it. Work on your connections. The more people like you the better off you are, always. Don’t build a fortress & lose sense of what’s going on around you. Be adaptable. Something doesn’t work out the way I planned, accept it, come to grips with it right then and there, then move on & work it out.


 


Question: @ MM: You have two businesses, why did you start blogging?


Answer (MM): Because of some macro-environment related reasons I had to sell Company 1 and Company 2 is only active during 2 months in summer.


Though this is not the reason why I started blogging. If you start blogging because you want to make money and get rich, you are in for a bad surprise according to studies analysing the blogging potential.


ModernMachiavelli.com is mainly there to entertain myself and to philosophise and get my thoughts down on paper. If I wanted to make money, I would write like a brain amputated crack monkey (Good Looking Loser comes to mind), keep my posts short and post frequently.


I am a rather stoic. I had some serious shit happen to me and people around me but never once do I torment myself with thoughts about things I can not change. I do not let such things drain my energy. Energy and motivation is a consequence of discipline & anger. Develop self-discipline (for example take a cold shower every morning, cut out various activities, etc.) and a state of constant anger. I have found a vision, an obsession with a goal combined with anger to be the most effective tool for getting things done.


My supplement list: Vitamin pills, creatine/beta-alanine mix. Sometimes nootropics and good old self-medication.


I held 20% of the LLC I was forced to sell. The other company is a limited partnership business entity and I only hire girls for the 2 months it is active.


Time is easy to come by if you spend it wisely. I don’t watch TV, except for football, news and politics, neither do I play video games.


Also, I try to limit sex to one Tinder slut every 10 days but sometimes more is unavoidable, if I have to attend a couple of evening events for example or in the case of today where I meet up with a journalist. Rarely ever do I party anymore. Maybe twice a month if I come across some good tickets.


Barely any meditation, no yoga.


And the last pillar of my efficient time schedule is a short workout routine. 2-3 times a week, maximum of 30 minutes. Greyskull LP with modifications.


That’s how I use my time efficiently. Effectiveness comes from the Pareto Principle combined with the Pomodoro method.


In the rare cases where I do lack energy for the day, I still manage to get by with a little help from my friends. Modafinil is great stuff, so is green tea as well as short deep breaths through the nose. But don’t overdo it. Too much oxygen can be loco for the brain. ;)


Politics is very appealing and I want to get a seat in parliament where you don’t really have a lot (read: any) of work to do, get an assistant as well as a “small compensation” in the form of nearly 8.000€. Or maybe topple the government, recreate Austria-Hungary and crown myself to the Kaiser. That would be fine too I guess.


I do enjoy consulting, giving advice and crafting schemes. Also I do have an excellent network, so starting my own business is as certain as the allahu akbar in a Jihadi John video.


Maybe get a master in psychology or master of advanced international studies (diplomacy).


But currently my whole libido is dedicated to a political plot that requires meticulous preparation, so I focus a lot of energy on that.


 


Question: If you engage yourself in office politics related places, how do you understand who is not a psychopath?


Answer (IM): You analyse for who has affective empathy, and who does not. Psychopaths do not have affective empathy so they have to mimic it, which requires acting ability.


Some are good actors, some are mediocre, and others do not bother acting at all. Check out a book called Snakes in Suits, it explores the premise to your question in more depth.


Related question: Is it sometimes like: person A is seriously ill, affective empathy would be: person B is kind of sad because person A is ill.


A: Yes but you would be sad because you like that person and don’t want bad things to happen them, not sad because they were a piece in your plan and you’re frustrated your plan is fucked up. That’s the distinction between being upset something isn’t going your way and being upset somebody is hurt/not ok.


Psychopaths get upset because the nature of transactionality is being fucked up, not because they care for the person involved. If said person was no longer part of their plans, their condition/death would have no effect on them.


Some psychopaths are good at using the frustration of having their plans messed with and presenting it as faux affective empathy, but most are rubbish at such façades and so if you know what you’re looking for it becomes blatantly obvious if you’re dealing with a psychopath. They’re all about the transaction, never about the people.


Answer (MM): Don’t focus on the right hand, only to get knocked out by a left hook.


Psychopaths do not necessarily have many motives to do something. Some do, others don’t. The size of the tool (Machiavellianism) is important.


If you give a functioning psychopath no reason to hate you and don’t expose vulnerable parts, he is most likely not going to take a stab at you. Keep the people in close sight who are competing with you for affection, credit, promotion etc.


Machiavellians are also proven by multiple peer-reviewed studies to be very paranoid. But again this is not a trait exclusive for Machiavellians & Psychopaths.


 


Question: How would you describe how your perspective on life in general differs from what most other people believe?


Answer (IL): I’m quick to sense when someone’s trying to manipulate me, even when it isn’t obvious. It’s essential to one’s success in the office, where the other is always trying to advance and thus sees you as a viable threat, when you’re doing a good job. Although I’m able to read people’s actions, I’m fully aware of the fact that I can fall victim to manipulation any day.


A narcissist might at some point believe that they’re invincible and immune to the deception of others. That very sentiment blinds them & makes them so much easier to manipulate, since they don’t believe it could happen to them. We’re very fallible & biased. There’s this great quote by Shakespeare, who himself practiced Machiavellian tactics.


“The fool doth think he is wise, but the wise man knows himself to be a fool.” I don’t think I’m that intelligent. However, when I take a good look around me I believe I’m a genius waiting to be discovered. I think it is a fact we’re surrounded by people who couldn’t be more incompetent and unqualified to do their jobs, many of them in authoritative positions. Plenty of them mistakenly assess their skill level to be much higher than reality suggests. The Dunning Kruger effect is at full play. A common mistake I see people making is operating on the assumption that the first-in, last-out the office worker bee always gets their deserved promotion based on merit. It’s primarily about popularity.


Answer (MM): Realism.


Take the refugee crisis for example. Of course I feel like that most of them are poor souls that really require help. But some of them are bringing rape, criminality and terrorism into the heart of my country and this can’t happen. If you give me a bowl of smarties and tell me that 5% are poisoned, even if I would love smarties, how many do you think I am going to eat?


There is the common misconception that Machiavellians are worse than Hitler. They are not. Sometimes maybe…


I will share a great quote of my father with you: “Life is not about whether you drink a 2€ wine or a 100€ wine, it is about having the power to change things.”


And this is not a statement made by an unsuccessful bum trying to justify his failure in life, pretending that he has achieved the enlightenment because he does good deeds while living in a 1 room toilet-in-the-bathroom flat.


Power is sexy, it feels amazing and, just like the horny college student chases hot college tail, I chase power.


I am always looking out for my friends and family. Loyalty is my honour. This doesn’t mean that I am not prepared to cut off dead bodies dragging me down.


Some people are to be used as fuel in the furnace of power. That’s the way of life and having regrets or second thoughts only holds you back. You need to be realistic and pragmatic, no matter who you are or what you points of view are.


 


Question: If you’re just starting out. What training system for learning to read people, channel emotion, become more mindful and present. Do you recommend?


Answer (IL): Study people in real life like you would observing a lab rat. Micromovements in the face, body posture and tone give away everything. I believe most of it is in the eyes, no matter what circumstance a person is in. You could read What everyBODY is saying, but there’s plenty of other good books on the subject. Tbh, I haven’t learnt any of this through books, rather through silent observation.


For full control of your emotions & for mindfulness read & practice stoic philosophy. For presence meditate & read Eckhart Tolle. I’d apologize for a short answer, but I do think it’s that simple.



Still, let me add to your question on emotions. Emotions can be so powerful that we just can’t suppress them at times. You can use this to your advantage and add it to the list of things that make people easily readable. At the same time, you want to practice your poker face. When you play a prank on someone and can’t keep yourself from laughing you’re fairly bad at it. The victim of the prank will sense that something’s up since you’re acting weird. It does not matter what you’re feeling on the inside, a good poker face handles all emotions.


I used to get angry a lot at my old job, sometimes to the point where I could feel my temperature going up to fiever-like symptoms, where I feared my head would look pepper-red on the outside. I also learnt to avoid making fists & have my hands open instead. I could’ve blown up and it would’ve felt good at that moment, but you remind yourself that the temporary satisfaction you get from releasing that tension would have consequences. If someone fucks you over, calm yourself down with the thought of taking revenge or sort things out in the future on your own terms. Same thing with emails. Never write them in anger or atleast save them as a draft in order to review them at a later date. Most often you will find that you were too emotional and thankful you didn’t click send.


I once reached a moment where I was ready to quit my job right then and there. I decided to give my decision another three days & things turned around. My problem was solved for me and I had nothing to do with it.


Answer (MM): I highly recommend you to read this book. It gives you an excellent overview of the body language signals and non-verbal communication. While humorously written it is a science based, no bullshit approach to the topic, backed by many examples and pictures to properly understand the dynamics behind body movements. We learn how to detect our own body language missteps and also why Hitler liked to cover his crown jewels with his hat, as well as cultural differences.


The Full Facts of Cold Reading is another great book, unfortunately I don’t have it listed in the books Machiavelli would read, so I can’t provide you with a link.


 


Question: What books about Power & Manipulation can you recommend?


Answer (IM): The Craft of Power, The Prince & 33 Strategies of War are great texts for this purpose. Also, check out my reading list and Illimitable’s to find an abundance of suggestions.


Answer (IL): I’d add to IllimitableMan’s great picks;


  • The Art of Seduction by Robert Greene

  • The Art of Manipulation by R.B. Sparkman

  • The Art of Wordly Wisdom by Baltasar Gracian

  • The Book of the Courtier by Baldesar Castiglione

 


Question: One of the important points of Law 24 (Play the perfect courtier) is to make others fear your power. How do you make others fear your power while maintaining a friendly vibe with others?


So far in life I have been able to usually accomplish this decently well but I would love to get your three’s take on this and hopefully obtain a deeper understanding.


Answer (MM):Always be nice, until it is time to stop being nice. I am certain that you are aware of the old saying “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth” and I guess you agree with it?


I don’t. If someone takes my eye, it take both of his. Always be friendly and easy going, praise, approach people in a sycophant way, be suave, be the perfect gentleman and courtier but hone the reputation of being a fear-inducing enemy.


Be aggressive, even if you fake it. Studies have shown that even if you fake being angry & aggressive and people are aware that you fake it, they will still get scared.


If someone cuts you off, cut his tongue off. Never allow yourself to be interrupted by equals and inferiors (please don’t use these techniques with your superiors, unless they are lying on the ground).


If someone starts an ad hominem attack against you, stare into his eyes. Open your eyes as wide as possible, don’t blink and never for one second look away. Here is an example of a perfect stare and keep in mind… the Duce is happy in this picture. Imagine the soul draining stare he gave his enemies. Also make sure that you are facing him in a straight line and not from an angle.


Also use sugar bread and whip. Reward and punishment. Condition people like Pavlov conditioned his dog. Related Law: http://modernmachiavelli.com/law-12-use-selective-honesty-and-generosity-to-disarm-your-victim/


 



Question: What if you want to take both the eyes of your enemy but your enemy is not trying to take yours?


Answer (MM): Convince yourself and the public that he is secretly planning to take your eye. -> Take his eyes.




 


Question: What exactly is Career Warfare?


Answer (MM): Career Warfare refers to everything related to getting ahead in the workplace. The term was coined by David D’Alessandro who wrote books like Career Warfare, Brand Warfare and Executive Warfare. He explains the importance of playing the game of office politics and personal branding in the workspace. While there are many books written about “Office Power”, these books are regarded as top notch. I have yet to read Brand & Executive Warfare, but Career Warfare is an excellent, insightful read, helping people survive the rat race.


 


Question: What is the best & fastest way to get ahead and promoted at work?


Answer (MM): You won’t like this answer but “it depends”. Since you didn’t give us much to work with, here are the basics:


Get accustomed to the specific workspace politics, know what is looked upon with favour or disfavour. Find out who the important people are and learn about their character, strengths, needs and weaknesses.


As soon as you have a basic overview, you want to web a net of allies. Especially but not limited to the bosses. Adhere the law 1 of never outshining your master. It is important to stroke the ego of your boss and present him in a good light. Yes, he is sometimes going to steal your credit, but this must not concern you. You must also make sure that your co-workers are on your side and not actively working against you behind your back. Don’t put too much trust into them though, and try to keep your private and professional life separated. Don’t believe that you are all loyal friends when you are going out, getting drunk and acting out of order.


This especially applies to company parties. Never get too drunk and make a clown out of yourself. Unfortunately many people break this rule.


You need to make sure that your reputation stays untainted from such mistakes. Guard your reputation with your life.


When shooting for the promotion it is a wise move to conceal your intentions in order to not arouse envy in your co-workers who might sabotage you. Unless you are certain that they are allies on your side and most likely going to help you. Again keep in mind that it is good to trust people, but not doing so is better.


Lear to keep people depend on you, yes, but do not become the person who does his job so great that he cannot be promoted without a significant hit to the department’s productivity.


A thing I pay attention to is to court attention at all costs. Try to get a desk as near to your boss as possible. Make your name brand itself into the conscious mind and be associated with positive traits.


 


Question: What is the best way to get started in Politics and to gain power, maintain power and survive in this environment?


Answer (IM): Learn Machiavellianism and become likeable, or someone people love to hate due to reprehensible behaviour but find absolutely charming. Charm does a lot to mitigate the adverse effects of dubiousness, and will allow you to get away with murder should you be sufficiently charming. Charm makes you likeable regardless of your ethics, remember this and incorporate it into your persona, it will do much for your personal power.


There are no “wikihow” style bullet points you can rote memorise to get power, if it were that easy, everybody would have power. Power is a cut throat game where only the most cunning thrive. Deciding to study power is taking the first step from pawn to player, but the rest is ultimately up to you. Study, learn charm, fuck up, and learn from your failures. Fuck up some more, then tell everybody about your fucks up one day so your enemies can’t use them against you. Do it with charm, and those who feel betrayed won’t be able to stay mad for long – many will forgive you. “It is easier to ask for forgiveness than permission.” The game is a dirty yet beautiful thing, the shades of grey within it surpass more than a mere fifty.


Most of the senior politicians have read Machiavelli, you should too.


Answer (MM): Starting in politics is unbelievably easy. I didn’t start getting (seriously) involved with politics until my mid-twenties and am constantly moving up in the food scale, with the highlight of recently having been promoted to the speaker for something.


You need to be aware of the skillset required to become successful as a politician. Without the following most important skill to possess as a politician, you are lost. No reason to even try. It is:


Be able to drink at least 2 bottles of wine without getting drunk.


You will probably believe that this is a joke. Well, 50/50. I want to stress the importance of networking.


There is not a single skill more important for rising the ranks. Study Social Interactions, know what types ofCharisma exist and which one is best suited for you. Learn to speak well. With authority, demanding respect. Confidence & Narcissism are beneficial and you should try to look your best.


I can not stress the importance of networking enough. Find out what activities your party has planned and do everything. Hand out flyers, sit in the voting booth, attend speeches, help prepare events, etc.


This brings me to another topic. Clothing style. I am in a “worker” party where the grunts dress casually. How do the ministers, parliament members & chancellor dress? They wear suits. Even if I wouldn’t trade in my own mother for Zegna suits, I would still make sure to dress like a king, to be treated like a king.


Of the utmost importance is a proper knowledge of the human psyche. 90% of everyone is out to prison rape you, given the chance. Maybe not at first, but the higher you move up, the more political schemes are involved. Master the art of strategic thinking and again, trust nobody.


In every party there are recruitment sections. My party for example has 5 different ones and they are all eagerly looking for fresh blood. Do some research about which party currently is in power and about the expected trends and choose your party based upon it. Or go with your “principles” or whatever that is and choose a bad party that aligns with your interests. Cognitive dissonance is overrated and it is a good exercise defending a point of view that goes against everything you stand for. Write them, phone them or show up at a meeting and introduce yourself to everyone. Remember their names, be likeable, connect with them over facebook and especially important, a mistake that many newcomers make: open your mouth. Too many newbies are too scared to voice their opinions and therefore never stand out. Of course, I know, at first it might be intimidating if some people who have been in the party their whole life speak without points and commas, but you need to give your input and if someone tries to interrupt you, don’t let them.